NAPOLEON Review: An Abject Failure From Top-To-Bottom

Introduction

Boring, pointless, and uninspired, Ridley Scott’s Napoleon attempts to side-step the traditional biopic pratfalls but forgets to do anything remotely interesting or captivating. Scott, and screenwriter David Scarpa, decide to forgo any background information on Napoleon and focus on his rapid ascension from ambitious soldier to Emperor of Rome. Unfortunately, they forgot to give the audience the slightest reason to care.

Synopsis/Analysis

Joaquin Phoenix stars as the titular Bonaparte, portrayed as a guy who doesn’t like loud noises, is insanely jealous of England, but also just took half an Ambien and is trying to fight off sleep. After being put in charge of one specific battle, he is automatically a general. Why did this happen? Because of reasons. He then quickly meets the widowed Josephine (Vanessa Kirby), falls in love, and gets married. Almost the moment they marry, Josephine begins taking a lover. Why does she do this? What drives her? Who knows, because the film doesn’t care.

The film’s posters promote the character as “he came from nothing, he conquered everything.” The “conquering” part makes sense. The “came from nothing” part doesn’t. There are two passed-over references to Napoleon being viewed as a “Corsican thug,” but that is quickly circumvented. The nation of France is in constant turmoil, but his emergence from relative obscurity just sort of happens. Why is he put in charge? Why is he so good at it? What makes him different? If the film knows, it isn’t about to tell the audience.

Napoleon-Ears
Joaquin Phoenix in a scene from ‘”Napolean” (2023). Photo courtesy of Sony/Apple TV+

This goes on for two-and-a-half hours. Luckily, Napoleon’s famous battle victories are interspersed throughout the film. These battles are poorly formed, extremely violent, and formless, but completely necessary. Otherwise, the audience would be lulled to sleep long before Bonaparte covers his ears (yet again) before another volley of cannon fire.

Cast

Signing up for what Phoenix brings is one thing, but he has shown in the past to be a fully committed actor. This is certainly not the case here. He will occasionally yell ridiculous things in the face of English ambassadors and aggressively and unpassionately have sex with Josephine, but that’s about as animated as he gets. The rest of the time, he is barely interested in what is going on. This version of Napoleon is not the propulsive force of nature whose never-ending quest for power was his downfall. This version fell into becoming the Emperor just because. Instead of wanting to know more about the man after the film, I wish I knew less.

Some could say Kirby is the bright spot, but that’s like complimenting a side dish of a meal that made you physically ill. Josephine is just as confusing and unknowable a character as Napoleon. She seeks Napoleon out but immediately sleeps around. She doesn’t want to be cast out but also doesn’t want to stick around. Once she is sent away, she pines for Napoleon’s attention, despite never seeming to want it. Does Kirby have the best performance? Yes. But that doesn’t mean it registers among the cacophony of insane choices.

Napoleon-Kirby
Vanessa Kirby in a scene from “Napolean” (2023). Photo courtesy of Sony/Apple TV+

Criticisms

The popular criticisms of Napoleon have been mainly focused on accents and historical accuracy. I am by no means passionate about French history and the Napoleonic era to say what was correct one way or the other. As far as the accents, I am able to suspend my disbelief enough that it didn’t matter. On my list of complaints about the film, the accents didn’t crack the top 50.

Conclusion

Ridley Scott has made a litany of great films, but Napoleon certainly isn’t one of them. Nothing works and nothing registers. It’s a disaster no matter how you slice it.

Napoleon premiered at Salle Pleyel in Paris on November 14, 2023, and is scheduled to be released in the US and United Kingdom on November 22, 2023, by Sony Pictures Releasing, before streaming on Apple TV+ at a later date.

Read more Cinema Scholars reviews!

SALTBURN: A Review Of Emerald Fennell’s Provocative Thriller At The Austin Film Festival

THE HOLDOVERS Review: Greatness Comes Down To Simplicity

Keep up with Cinema Scholars on social media. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter and Instagram.

Introduction Boring, pointless, and uninspired, Ridley Scott’s Napoleon attempts to side-step the traditional biopic pratfalls but forgets to do anything remotely interesting or captivating. Scott, and screenwriter David Scarpa, decide to forgo any background information on Napoleon and focus on his rapid ascension from ambitious soldier...NAPOLEON Review: An Abject Failure From Top-To-Bottom
Verified by MonsterInsights