Home Reviews Modern Reviews 28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE Review: Two Become One

28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE Review: Two Become One

0

Introduction

There were three red flags for me going into 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple. The first is that the entire franchise is decidedly mediocre. All three films to this point have been forgettable. I’ve already forgotten the third one, even though I watched it less than a month ago. The second flag is that this is the fourth movie in the franchise, and the first three have essentially the same plot: don’t get eaten by zombies. Why would we expect anything different now? The third flag is that 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple got a mid-January release date. Woof.

It would be an understatement to say I was pleasantly surprised by how good The Bone Temple was. The truth is, I was almost in awe. I just wish it hadn’t taken writer Alex Garland three sequels to realize the zombies were only the story in the first movie of the franchise. 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple is a direct sequel to 28 Years Later (both were filmed simultaneously), but it’s also a companion piece.

Ralph Fiennes stars in “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple” (2025). Photo courtesy of Sony Pictures Releasing.

Synopsis

This newest installment features two completely separate story arcs that eventually converge. One features the continued adventures of young Spike (Alfie Williams) after he strikes back out into the quarantine zone at the end of the previous film. The other features Dr. Ian Kelson, the doctor Spike seeks out in 28 Years Later, in the hopes that his sick mother can be cured.

Young Spike finds himself trapped in a small satanist group led by Sir Lord Jimmy Crystal (Jack O’Connell). The group represents the de-evolution of man in almost every way possible. They have stopped thinking for themselves, completely subservient to Jimmy Crystal. They have no home, roaming the land and taking what they want through violence and killing. And they even fight amongst themselves on occasion, culling the weakest from the group whenever they happen upon a new non-zombie person who might prove useful.

Spike is terrified, but nearly helpless to extricate himself due to his still being a small human adolescent. On the other side of the movie, Kelson takes a scientific and medical interest in an alpha zombie he’s named Samson. Samson represents the evolution of man. Using blow darts tipped with a healthy dose of morphine, Kelson has discovered that he can sedate Samson to the point that Samson won’t try to rip Kelson’s skull and spine from his body.

Kelson has also discovered that while Samson is sedated, he is responsive to things like music, dancing, and conversation. Kelson’s theory is that the rage virus suppresses brain function instead of just killing it (among other things), and the morphine counteracts that suppression to a certain degree. Make no mistake, Kelson isn’t trying to cure the virus, just understand it a bit better. More importantly, the entire experiment is returning some of Samson’s humanity.

Discussion

As you can see, these two storylines perfectly complement each other. By itself, each story is interesting, but not enough to carry an entire movie. But put them together and, oh man, have you really got something good. Given that it makes perfect sense these two arcs would crash into each other, this raises a final question: which version of humanity will persevere?

There are a couple of things that make the movie so compelling, beyond those two storylines. One is spending real time exploring the virus itself. Most zombie films don’t bother with this because that’s not the point. Just like the first film in this franchise (28 Days Later), the point is survival of the remaining non-zombified humans. But dissecting how the virus works allows The Bone Temple to explore some of what makes us human.

The second is focusing on how humans behave decades after the initial fall of civilization. The Walking Dead does this really well, even though it can’t quite get out of its own way with the zombies. In this film, the zombies are part of the environment, even Samson. Instead of being an existential threat that is always run from, they are something to study and understand. The Walking Dead never went that far (if it did, it was after I grew bored and quit watching).

Jack O’Connell stars in “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple” (2026). Photo courtesy of Sony Pictures Releasing.

Conclusion

The last thing is a scene that is (already) known as “The Iron Maiden Scene.” I won’t tell you anything about this scene other than it’s simply amazing. The last time I saw a scene as good was in season four of Game of Thrones when Tyrion Lannister rips into everyone after being accused of murdering Joffrey.

The Iron Maiden Scene is the only time I can remember the entire theater audience bursting into applause after a scene that didn’t involve a climactic battle or a villain getting their just desserts or the movie ending. And that applause happened again at the end. The movie really was that good.

Rating: Don’t ask for any of your money back in January for the first time ever.

Read more Cinema Scholar reviews!

PLAY DIRTY Review: A Robbery Of A Character

THE SMASHING MACHINE Review: Who Dis?

Keep up with Cinema Scholars on social media. Like us on Facebook, subscribe on YouTube, and follow us on Twitter and Instagram.

Exit mobile version